LeCanadian

Top Menu

  • Login
  • Archives
  • Les Actualités
  • Advertising
  • Sexy Pages
  • Contact Us

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating
  • Login
  • Archives
  • Les Actualités
  • Advertising
  • Sexy Pages
  • Contact Us

logo

Header Banner

LeCanadian

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating
  • Comment gérer un retard de vol ?

  • 5 ways sudoku boosts brain health

  • 10 tips to successfully market your law firm

  • 7 Amazing Gifts for Kids Who Like to Cook

  • Make Mortgage Overpayments Work for You

Health
Home›Health›CRISPR Gene Editing Lies Exposed by Genomics Expert: The ‘Official’ Narrative is Just Another GMO

CRISPR Gene Editing Lies Exposed by Genomics Expert: The ‘Official’ Narrative is Just Another GMO

By admin
May 3, 2016
1806
0
Share:
The biotechnology industry is carrying out a concerted public-relations campaign to promote the idea that new, so-called “gene editing” technologies are the more accurate, safer successor to now-defunct traditional genetic engineering (GE). But this campaign is founded upon several straight-up myths about the new technology, which is nothing more than the same reckless GE paradigm under another name, says geneticist and virologist Jonathan Latham, Executive Director of the Bioscience Resource Project and editor of Independent Science News.

Echoing industry talking points, mainstream news sources have been publishing article with headlines such as, “Easy DNA Editing Will Remake the World. Buckle Up.”

“The hubris is alarming; but the more subtle element of the propaganda campaign is the biggest and most dangerous improbability of them all: that CRISPR and related technologies are ‘genome editing,'” Latham writes on Independent Science News. “That is, they are capable of creating precise, accurate, and specific alterations to DNA.”

Propaganda war

Latham notes that this “public relations blitz” is directed from the top-down, citing a senior representative of the Biotechnology Industry Organisation (BIO) who told the UN meeting on biotechnology in February about the “exquisite specificity” and “precision” of the new gene editing technologies. These talking points are now even being parroted by serious scientific publications, with a recent article in Nature titled, “Super-muscly pigs created by small genetic tweak.”

Latham notes that the words “small” and “tweak” both constitute value judgments, neither of which is in line with the information presented in the article.

The technology in question is known as Clustered Regularly-Interspaced Short Palindromic Repeats/CRISPR associated protein 9: CRISPR/cas9, or simply CRISPR for short. It consists of using a guide RNA to direct a DNA-splicing protein to a specific site on the genome. But is it really the miracle innovation it’s billed as?

No such thing as precision

Latham deconstructs three myths of the biotech industry. The first is that CRISPR is so precise that it is not prone to errors. In fact, the opposite is true: CRISPR experiments regularly produce mutations far off on the genome.

“So far, it is technically not possible to make a single (and only a single) genetic change to a genome using CRISPR and be sure one has done so,” Latham writes. In fact, there is no evidence that such a degree of precision is even biologically possible.

The second myth is that precision is the same thing as control; that is, the ability to splice an exact gene confers equally precise control over the biological outcome.

“Suppose, as a non-Chinese speaker, I were to precisely remove from a Chinese text one character, one line, or one page,” Latham writes. “I would have one hundred percent precision, but zero control over the change in meaning. Precision, therefore, is only as useful as the understanding that underlies it, and surely no DNA biologist would propose we understand DNA–or else why are we studying it?”

The third myth is that “DNA functions are modular and changes are predictable,” that is, each gene produces only a single trait, and does so all the time. But although this was the model first used to describe genetics, there is no evidence that any gene actually operates in this fashion. And it is also untrue that genes always have the same effects, Latham notes: “Most gene function is mediated murkily through highly complex biochemical and other networks that depend on many conditional factors,” such as the age of the organism, environmental conditions, interactions with other genes and even random chance.

As a counter-example to these myths, Latham returns to the example of the muscly pigs: In addition to more muscles, the pigs developed other traits such as thicker skin, thicker bones, difficulty giving birth and a greater appetite.

“Thus a supposedly simple genetic tweak can have wide effects on the organism throughout its lifecycle,” he writes. “Nature also revealed that thirty of the thirty two pigs died prematurely and only one animal was still considered healthy at the time the study authors were interviewed. So much for precision.”

Sources for this article include:

GMWatch.org

Science.NaturalNews.com

Read More..

Post Views: 1,898
Previous Article

Rise in Carbon Dioxide Unleashing Global Greening, ...

Next Article

Flint Water Poisoning Was Covered Up Using ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Health

    Eating almonds found to accelerate the body’s mechanism for eliminating high cholesterol

    September 5, 2017
    By admin
  • Health

    Transgenderism results in the DEATH of a baby because medical records listed the mother as “male” to appease the LGBT ...

    May 24, 2019
    By admin
  • Health

    OUTRAGE: Big Pharma Ordered to Pay $70M After Concealing Adverse Effects of Cancer Drugs and Misleading Doctors

    June 15, 2016
    By admin
  • Health

    BioNTech co-founder echoes Pfizer CEO, expects people to get vaccinated against coronavirus annually

    May 10, 2021
    By admin
  • Health

    Johnson & Johnson vaccine under investigation over deadly blood clot cases

    May 8, 2021
    By admin
  • Health

    Six Powerful Home Remedies for Acne

    December 20, 2017
    By admin

Featured Petition

  • Bell Baker’s John Summers – Stop a Crime Against Humanity – What would his Mother think?
  • John E Summers: Ottawa Lawyer Attacks Motherhood and Civil Rights – Support His Disbarment
  • Stop Ottawa Lawyer John Summers’, Marcella Carby-Samuels’ & David Tenenbaum’s Ab
  • Week
  • Month

Week

Sorry. No data so far.

Month

Sorry. No data so far.

Popular on The Le Canadian

  1. AgoraCosmopolitan
  2. Agora Publishing Consortium
  3. Le Journal Canadien
  4. Dominion: Food News
  5. LeCanadian.com
  6. The Ottawa Star
  7. Capitalistocracy.com
  8. Agora Books Author House
  9. First Nations Press
  10. The Etiquette Show
  11. Ontario People's Front





Mark's



Recent Posts

  • Comment gérer un retard de vol ?
  • 5 ways sudoku boosts brain health
  • 10 tips to successfully market your law firm
  • 7 Amazing Gifts for Kids Who Like to Cook
  • Make Mortgage Overpayments Work for You
  • Son shares warning for immunocompromised after fully-vaccinated Tampa Bay dad dies from COVID-19
  • Catching Covid-19 after being vaccinated isn’t a myth. It happened to me
  • My COVID Story: “I got COVID after being fully vaccinated”
  • Albertans fully vaccinated for COVID-19 urged to stay cautious during pandemic’s 4th wave
  • I got the vaccine – and then I got Covid: Readers share their stories

Most Viewed Posts

No Posts found

Visitors

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating