LeCanadian

Top Menu

  • Login
  • Archives
  • Les Actualités
  • Advertising
  • Sexy Pages
  • Contact Us

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login
  • Login
  • Archives
  • Les Actualités
  • Advertising
  • Sexy Pages
  • Contact Us

logo

Header Banner

LeCanadian

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating
  • 7 reasons why online casinos are so popular in Ontario

  • La Commission indépendante soutient le recours de la Cour suprême contre le déni des droits des non-francophones par le Québec

  • Independent Commission endorses Supreme Court of Canada challenge against Quebec’s denial of rights to non-francophones

  • Ottawa International Crafts & Book Expo 2023: An assembly of literary brilliance

  • Diane Descôteaux – Une haïkiste passionnée: Le Salon d’Ottawa

Business
Home›Business›Forced Employee Ranking is a Foolish Approach

Forced Employee Ranking is a Foolish Approach

By admin
May 10, 2016
1835
0
Share:

This column is part of Globe Careers’ Leadership Lab series, where executives and experts share their views and advice about leadership and management. Follow us at @Globe_Careers. Find all Leadership Lab stories at tgam.ca/leadershiplab

Measuring and tracking individual and team performance is an effective way of both motivating employees and celebrating successes in organizations. But there’s one aspect of the performance review process (particularly in large companies) that is counter-productive, and frankly, foolish. I speak of the process of “forced ranking” that demands managers and supervisors fit their employees into pre-set slots on a bell curve.

In case you’re not familiar with the concept, bell-curving has its roots in the educational system where the objective is to minimize or eliminate the influence of variation between different instructors of the same course, ensuring that the students in any given class are assessed relative to their peers. In the final assessment, because a bell curve ensures a balanced and normal distribution of academic results, it holds some logic in an educational setting. But it absolutely does not make sense in a work environment. Bell-curving basically forces a manager to say that a certain percentage of his/her employees are sub-par. Repeatedly. Every year. And regrettably, it is standard operating procedure in many large organizations.

Here’s why this is senseless and damaging. If you trust that your managers and supervisors are good leaders (and if not, why did you put them in their roles?), then you have to also have confidence that they will hire good people. Which means that there shouldn’t be a necessity to have people on the lower end of the curve. In fact, ironically, bell curve performance assessments only encourage the hiring and retention of so-so (or worse) employees. And even more destructive, bell curve performance assessments are hugely demoralizing to employees. Imagine hiring brilliant people only to label them as unworthy because you are forced to place them on a bell curve.

As if this isn’t bad enough, many organizations add insult to injury by insisting that leaders compare all their employees and put them in order of best to worst within each segment on the bell curve. If bell-curving is a bad idea, then this is even worse. Now let me be clear – I don’t have a problem with assessing an individual’s performance and recognizing that some employees are higher performers than others. I am certainly not a supporter of the “everyone is a winner” camp. But it’s the process of forcing every single person into a rank order that I find objectionable. There are times when a numerical ranking is possible and even sensible, say based on revenue generated, or calls handled, or some similar metric. But for the most part, exceptional performance is not a numerical score, so when you try to force-quantify it, all you end up doing is demoralizing your people. If you assume that you hired good employees to start with, then every single one should bring unique value to the workplace. So why would you try to force a comparison if it’s not appropriate? Sure, there may be rough groupings that employees naturally fall into (exceptional, very good, and good, for example), but imposing a numerical ranking when it doesn’t fit the situation is pointless. Worse than pointless, this numerical ranking on a bell curve actually drives good people away. An employee that’s forced into a No. 5 ranking because of minor things separating him from No. 1 will just move on to an organization that appreciates his talents more. And their gain will be your loss.

Bell-curving doesn’t have a place in high-performance workplaces. And unless the employee’s job has quantifiable metrics, forced numerical ranking doesn’t either. It’s time to get rid of both these distasteful practices.

Merge Gupta-Sunderji (@mergespeaks) is a speaker and author with 17 years of management experience in corporate Canada. Reach her or join the conversations on her blog at TurningManagersIntoLeaders.com.

Read More..

Post Views: 1,989
Previous Article

In Fort McMurray, Insurers Face Key Test ...

Next Article

Fintech Companies Are Joining Forces With Credit ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Business

    Angry Birds maker may take off with $2-billion IPO

    September 6, 2017
    By admin
  • Business

    Tesla Plans to Get Into ride-hailing and -sharing Businesses

    October 22, 2016
    By admin
  • Business

    Mile End Ensemble hosts ‘read-in’ protest for S. W. Welch Bookseller

    March 30, 2021
    By admin
  • Business

    Pot Supplier Canopy Growth to Buy Mettrum Health in $430M Deal

    December 2, 2016
    By admin
  • Business

    Panama Papers Database of Offshore Companies Goes Live

    May 10, 2016
    By admin
  • Business

    New jobs available in rural communities

    January 19, 2021
    By admin

Featured Petition

  • Bell Baker’s John Summers – Stop a Crime Against Humanity – What would his Mother think?
  • John E Summers: Ottawa Lawyer Attacks Motherhood and Civil Rights – Support His Disbarment
  • Stop Ottawa Lawyer John Summers’, Marcella Carby-Samuels’ & David Tenenbaum’s Ab
  • Week
  • Month

Week

Sorry. No data so far.

Month

  • 7 reasons why online casi... In the ever-evolving landscape of entertainment and lei...

Popular on The Le Canadian

  1. The Independent Canadian Commission on Civil and Human Rights
  2. AgoraCosmopolitan
  3. Ottawa Market
  4. Agora Publishing Consortium
  5. Le Journal Canadien
  6. Dominion: Food News
  7. LeCanadian.com
  8. The Ottawa Star
  9. Capitalistocracy.com
  10. Agora Books Author House
  11. First Nations Press
  12. The Etiquette Show
  13. Ontario People's Front





Mark's



Recent Posts

  • 7 reasons why online casinos are so popular in Ontario
  • La Commission indépendante soutient le recours de la Cour suprême contre le déni des droits des non-francophones par le Québec
  • Independent Commission endorses Supreme Court of Canada challenge against Quebec’s denial of rights to non-francophones
  • Ottawa International Crafts & Book Expo 2023: An assembly of literary brilliance
  • Diane Descôteaux – Une haïkiste passionnée: Le Salon d’Ottawa
  • Diane Descôteaux – Une haïkiste passionnée: Le Salon d’Ottawa
  • How Canadians can access online casinos through mobile phones
  • Comment gérer un retard de vol ?
  • 5 ways sudoku boosts brain health
  • 10 tips to successfully market your law firm

Most Viewed Posts

  • Automated China –Mass-Producing the Future (61,382)
  • Health: Shampoo Helps Hair Loss Sufferers (57,672)
  • Citizens of Italy unleash mass protests against mandatory vaccination law (39,210)
  • Why Investors are Putting Their Money on High-End Real Estate (37,245)
  • Montréal : le cœur battant de la génération Y (37,086)
  • Une Autre Facette de Richard Lipman : Le Soutien d’un Psychologue à la Fondation Fauna (32,512)
  • Introduction To How And Where You Can Trade CFDs (30,165)
  • Canada’s Property Values Rise, In Spite of Signs of Market Slowdown (21,159)
  • “Not Gonna Write Poems” A Poetry Book by Dr. Michael Lee: Could He Be The Next Shel Silverstein? (17,363)
  • Smoking is Still a Problem in Society – But it’s a Problem That’s Being Addressed (16,158)

Visitors

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating