LeCanadian

Top Menu

  • Login
  • Archives
  • Les Actualités
  • Advertising
  • Sexy Pages
  • Contact Us

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating
  • Login
  • Archives
  • Les Actualités
  • Advertising
  • Sexy Pages
  • Contact Us

logo

Header Banner

LeCanadian

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating
  • 5 ways sudoku boosts brain health

  • 10 tips to successfully market your law firm

  • 7 Amazing Gifts for Kids Who Like to Cook

  • Make Mortgage Overpayments Work for You

  • Son shares warning for immunocompromised after fully-vaccinated Tampa Bay dad dies from COVID-19

Business
Home›Business›Forced Employee Ranking is a Foolish Approach

Forced Employee Ranking is a Foolish Approach

By admin
May 10, 2016
1647
0
Share:

This column is part of Globe Careers’ Leadership Lab series, where executives and experts share their views and advice about leadership and management. Follow us at @Globe_Careers. Find all Leadership Lab stories at tgam.ca/leadershiplab

Measuring and tracking individual and team performance is an effective way of both motivating employees and celebrating successes in organizations. But there’s one aspect of the performance review process (particularly in large companies) that is counter-productive, and frankly, foolish. I speak of the process of “forced ranking” that demands managers and supervisors fit their employees into pre-set slots on a bell curve.

In case you’re not familiar with the concept, bell-curving has its roots in the educational system where the objective is to minimize or eliminate the influence of variation between different instructors of the same course, ensuring that the students in any given class are assessed relative to their peers. In the final assessment, because a bell curve ensures a balanced and normal distribution of academic results, it holds some logic in an educational setting. But it absolutely does not make sense in a work environment. Bell-curving basically forces a manager to say that a certain percentage of his/her employees are sub-par. Repeatedly. Every year. And regrettably, it is standard operating procedure in many large organizations.

Here’s why this is senseless and damaging. If you trust that your managers and supervisors are good leaders (and if not, why did you put them in their roles?), then you have to also have confidence that they will hire good people. Which means that there shouldn’t be a necessity to have people on the lower end of the curve. In fact, ironically, bell curve performance assessments only encourage the hiring and retention of so-so (or worse) employees. And even more destructive, bell curve performance assessments are hugely demoralizing to employees. Imagine hiring brilliant people only to label them as unworthy because you are forced to place them on a bell curve.

As if this isn’t bad enough, many organizations add insult to injury by insisting that leaders compare all their employees and put them in order of best to worst within each segment on the bell curve. If bell-curving is a bad idea, then this is even worse. Now let me be clear – I don’t have a problem with assessing an individual’s performance and recognizing that some employees are higher performers than others. I am certainly not a supporter of the “everyone is a winner” camp. But it’s the process of forcing every single person into a rank order that I find objectionable. There are times when a numerical ranking is possible and even sensible, say based on revenue generated, or calls handled, or some similar metric. But for the most part, exceptional performance is not a numerical score, so when you try to force-quantify it, all you end up doing is demoralizing your people. If you assume that you hired good employees to start with, then every single one should bring unique value to the workplace. So why would you try to force a comparison if it’s not appropriate? Sure, there may be rough groupings that employees naturally fall into (exceptional, very good, and good, for example), but imposing a numerical ranking when it doesn’t fit the situation is pointless. Worse than pointless, this numerical ranking on a bell curve actually drives good people away. An employee that’s forced into a No. 5 ranking because of minor things separating him from No. 1 will just move on to an organization that appreciates his talents more. And their gain will be your loss.

Bell-curving doesn’t have a place in high-performance workplaces. And unless the employee’s job has quantifiable metrics, forced numerical ranking doesn’t either. It’s time to get rid of both these distasteful practices.

Merge Gupta-Sunderji (@mergespeaks) is a speaker and author with 17 years of management experience in corporate Canada. Reach her or join the conversations on her blog at TurningManagersIntoLeaders.com.

Read More..

Post Views: 1,737
Previous Article

In Fort McMurray, Insurers Face Key Test ...

Next Article

Fintech Companies Are Joining Forces With Credit ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Business

    Canadians Need to Earn America’s Trust, Says Ambassador

    November 22, 2016
    By admin
  • Business

    Toronto Renters Saving Home Ownership for Cottage Country

    June 29, 2016
    By admin
  • Business

    Starbucks sells Tazo tea brand

    November 6, 2017
    By admin
  • Business

    John Summers: Ottawa lawyer linked to premature death of elderly black disabled woman

    January 11, 2021
    By admin
  • Business

    Jobless Rate Slides Despite Decline in full-time Work

    December 4, 2016
    By admin
  • Business

    Samsung Says Galaxy Note 7 Recall to Cost at Least $5.3 Billion

    October 18, 2016
    By admin

Featured Petition

  • Bell Baker’s John Summers – Stop a Crime Against Humanity – What would his Mother think?
  • John E Summers: Ottawa Lawyer Attacks Motherhood and Civil Rights – Support His Disbarment
  • Stop Ottawa Lawyer John Summers’, Marcella Carby-Samuels’ & David Tenenbaum’s Ab
  • Week
  • Month

Week

Sorry. No data so far.

Month

Sorry. No data so far.

Popular on The Le Canadian

  1. AgoraCosmopolitan
  2. Agora Publishing Consortium
  3. Le Journal Canadien
  4. Dominion: Food News
  5. LeCanadian.com
  6. The Ottawa Star
  7. Capitalistocracy.com
  8. Agora Books Author House
  9. First Nations Press
  10. The Etiquette Show
  11. Ontario People's Front





Mark's



Recent Posts

  • 5 ways sudoku boosts brain health
  • 10 tips to successfully market your law firm
  • 7 Amazing Gifts for Kids Who Like to Cook
  • Make Mortgage Overpayments Work for You
  • Son shares warning for immunocompromised after fully-vaccinated Tampa Bay dad dies from COVID-19
  • Catching Covid-19 after being vaccinated isn’t a myth. It happened to me
  • My COVID Story: “I got COVID after being fully vaccinated”
  • Albertans fully vaccinated for COVID-19 urged to stay cautious during pandemic’s 4th wave
  • I got the vaccine – and then I got Covid: Readers share their stories
  • Brazilian minister tests positive for Covid after meeting maskless Johnson

Most Viewed Posts

No Posts found

Visitors

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating