LeCanadian

Top Menu

  • Login
  • Archives
  • Les Actualités
  • Advertising
  • Sexy Pages
  • Contact Us

Main Menu

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating
Sign in / Join

Login

Welcome! Login in to your account
Lost your password?

Lost Password

Back to login
  • Login
  • Archives
  • Les Actualités
  • Advertising
  • Sexy Pages
  • Contact Us

logo

Header Banner

LeCanadian

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating
  • Money Management Tips for Financially Challenging Times

  • 7 reasons why online casinos are so popular in Ontario

  • La Commission indépendante soutient le recours de la Cour suprême contre le déni des droits des non-francophones par le Québec

  • Independent Commission endorses Supreme Court of Canada challenge against Quebec’s denial of rights to non-francophones

  • Ottawa International Crafts & Book Expo 2023: An assembly of literary brilliance

Health
Home›Health›Op-ed: How the FDA ignores the law when approving new chemical additives to food

Op-ed: How the FDA ignores the law when approving new chemical additives to food

By admin
January 12, 2021
819
0
Share:

An investigation finds the federal agency is not accounting for the cumulative health effect of chemicals as required by law. Such neglect leaves consumers at higher risk for chronic diseases.

(Article by Maricel V. Maffini & Thomas G. Nelter republished from EHN.org)

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration’s (FDA) failure on food chemical safety has left consumers at risk of chronic diseases.

The agency is required to review the safety of classes of chemicals rather than individual chemicals. Using the class approach, multiple chemicals adversely affecting the same organ or system (such as the immune, endocrine, or nervous systems) are evaluated together and a safe consumption level is determined for the class. This approach prevents the intentional new or expanded uses of chemical additives that increase chronic disease and, when coupled with a systematic review of prior decisions, results in health risk reduction. Instead, the agency has consistently reviewed individual chemicals without regard to the cumulative effect on chronic disease.

In the last 60 years, innovations in processing, preserving, and packaging have made food more affordable, convenient, and available. To accomplish this transformation, industry, with the FDA’s approval, has brought thousands of chemicals into the food system, resulting in diets increasingly composed of ultra-processed foods without regard for the cumulative effect of these additives and their long-term chronic health consequences.

When Congress passed the Food Additive Amendment in 1958 in response to a rapidly changing food system and rising public and scientific concerns about the potential health risks of new chemical additives, it included a health-protective requirement: the cumulative effect of chemically and pharmacologically related substances in the diet must be taken into account when assessing the safety of new additives. That means, additives with similar toxic effects, either because they look alike or affect similar body functions, must be evaluated together to prevent exposures above an amount that would cause harm.

However, food manufacturers and regulators have neglected to consider this cumulative effect, failing to harness changes in food technology and use advances in scientific knowledge to protect the public from dietary chemical exposures. Medical associations and a group of health, environmental and consumer organizations have jointly challenged the FDA to change its practice of not accounting for the cumulative health effect of chemicals in the diet as required by law.

We are sick

A lot of us are affected by chronic health conditions. Diabetes in children and adults; attention, learning and memory disorders; obesity in children and adults; thyroid dysfunction; and the list goes on. Experts call them non-communicable diseases because, unlike pathogens like bacteria and viruses, we do not pass them from one person to another. Global public health experts linked tobacco use, physical inactivity, alcohol abuse, and unhealthy diets to increases in the risk of non-communicable diseases.

Unhealthy diets are usually associated with calorie-dense nutrient-poor foods, often called ultra-processed foods, due to their ingredients resulting from a series of industrial processes, many requiring sophisticated equipment and technology (sweet and savory snacks, reconstituted meats). In addition to industrially produced ingredients (high-fructose corn syrup, protein isolates, hydrogenated oil), such food also contains numerous additives including dyes, flavors, emulsifiers, thickeners, and artificial sweeteners. Further, industrial chemicals used in packaging manufacturing and food processing equipment —such as bisphenol A (BPA), phthalates, PFAS, perchlorate— are also found in these foods.

These intentional uses of chemical additives number in the thousands, and many have been linked to endocrine disruption, neurological and behavioral problems, cancer, and heart and liver disease.

Congress added guardrails against chronic health effects

In the U.S., approximately 10,000 chemicals can be purposely added to food or enter the food supply through processing equipment and packaging, and 60 percent of the calories ingested are from ultra-processed foods. In 1958, Congress gave the FDA authority to regulate chemicals intentionally added to food or to food contact materials, commonly known as food additives, to ensure their use is safe. Safe means the potential toxic health effects of a new additive that becomes part of the diet must be assessed in combination with other substances already present and are expected to have similar health effects. Thus, the cumulative assessment of health effects by a class of related substances prevents the addition of intentional new or expanded uses of chemical additives that would increase chronic disease. Moreover, this approach, together with systematic review of prior safety decisions results in health risk reduction.

FDA neglected its responsibility to follow the law

We wanted to investigate whether and how food manufacturers and the FDA had implemented the cumulative effect requirement. To do that, we downloaded and reviewed all 877 safety determinations contained in the Generally Recognized as Safe (GRAS) notifications inventory. These notices were voluntarily submitted by food manufacturers to the FDA between 1997, when GRAS notification program began, and March 24, 2020. We looked at GRAS notices because they are publicly available and FDA rules require that food manufacturers include in the notice an explanation of how they considered the cumulative health effect of a new additive. Unfortunately, our investigation showed that both the FDA and the food manufacturers appeared to have ignored this crucial safety requirement.

We searched the documents for terms “cumulative effect” and “pharmacological” presuming that any analysis of the cumulative effect of chemical or pharmacologically related substances would include those terms. We evaluated every positive finding for context and reviewed the document more closely when warranted. We found that in only one of 877 GRAS notices did a food manufacturer consider the cumulative effect requirement in a meaningful way. Notably, that one notice stopped short of establishing a safe exposure for the class as required by regulation. And we found no evidence that the agency either recognized this single attempt to follow the law or had objected to the omissions in the 876 other notices.

To better understand how these blatant omissions happened, we also reviewed the FDA’s relevant guidance for industry documents to determine if they contain information to help industry understand how to consider the cumulative effect of the substance as required by law and regulations. We used the agency’s online research tool and identified 21 documents related to food chemicals. For each document, we searched for key terms including “cumulative effect”, “chemically related”, “pharmacological effects”, and “pharmacologically related”. We also searched for references to key regulations or statutory provisions directly related to the cumulative effect requirement. We found next to nothing and what information was there was either incomplete or confusing.

Ten documents did not mention the legal requirement and two simply restated it. Four documents created confusion by using terms such as ‘cumulative exposure’ or ‘cumulative intake.’ Five documents provided incomplete and potentially misleading information. For example, excluding the requirement from the definition of safety or paraphrasing the safety requirement in a manner that limited the assessment to a single chemical instead of related substances in the diet.

Post Views: 1,002
Previous Article

DON’T ASK, JUST EAT! Lab-made Franken-meat contains ...

Next Article

Suspicions grow that nanoparticles in Pfizer’s COVID-19 ...

0
Shares
  • 0
  • +
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0
  • 0

Related articles More from author

  • Health

    Why You Can Never Trust the Pesticide Industry’s Own Safety Tests

    May 9, 2016
    By admin
  • Health

    From bad to worse: Diet drinks will wreck your health, and the damage they do gets worse as you get ...

    June 13, 2019
    By admin
  • Health

    Big Pharma’s coronavirus vaccines will do more harm than good, warns health expert

    May 8, 2021
    By admin
  • Health

    Unhealthy Foods are Taking Over the World’s Diet

    September 4, 2018
    By admin
  • Health

    COVID-19 vaccines to decimate world population, warns microbiologist … and it’s already happening in India and Brazil

    May 6, 2021
    By admin
  • Health

    Brain training app claims to improve concentration, but is it better than proper diet and an active lifestyle?

    May 24, 2019
    By admin


AWeber Smart Designer




Popupar Articles

  • Week
  • Month

Week

Sorry. No data so far.

Month

  • Money Management Tips for... One in four Canadians can’t afford an unexpected expens...

Popular on The Le Canadian

  1. The Independent Canadian Commission on Civil and Human Rights
  2. Ottawa Winter Fest
  3. Ottawa Market
  4. Salon du Livre d'Ottawa
  5. Ottawa Book Expo
  6. AgoraCosmopolitan
  7. Agora Publishing Consortium
  8. Le Journal Canadien
  9. Dominion: Food News
  10. LeCanadian.com
  11. The Ottawa Star
  12. Capitalistocracy.com
  13. Agora Books Author House
  14. First Nations Press
  15. Toronto Digital Flog Newspaper
  16. The Etiquette Show
  17. Ontario People's Front
  18. COVID-19 unvaccinated singles

Recent Posts

  • Money Management Tips for Financially Challenging Times
  • 7 reasons why online casinos are so popular in Ontario
  • La Commission indépendante soutient le recours de la Cour suprême contre le déni des droits des non-francophones par le Québec
  • Independent Commission endorses Supreme Court of Canada challenge against Quebec’s denial of rights to non-francophones
  • Ottawa International Crafts & Book Expo 2023: An assembly of literary brilliance
  • Diane Descôteaux – Une haïkiste passionnée: Le Salon d’Ottawa
  • Diane Descôteaux – Une haïkiste passionnée: Le Salon d’Ottawa
  • How Canadians can access online casinos through mobile phones
  • Comment gérer un retard de vol ?
  • 5 ways sudoku boosts brain health

Most Viewed Posts

  • Automated China –Mass-Producing the Future (61,574)
  • Health: Shampoo Helps Hair Loss Sufferers (59,593)
  • Citizens of Italy unleash mass protests against mandatory vaccination law (39,407)
  • Why Investors are Putting Their Money on High-End Real Estate (37,478)
  • Montréal : le cœur battant de la génération Y (37,287)
  • Une Autre Facette de Richard Lipman : Le Soutien d’un Psychologue à la Fondation Fauna (32,693)
  • Introduction To How And Where You Can Trade CFDs (30,361)
  • Canada’s Property Values Rise, In Spite of Signs of Market Slowdown (21,479)
  • “Not Gonna Write Poems” A Poetry Book by Dr. Michael Lee: Could He Be The Next Shel Silverstein? (17,557)
  • Smoking is Still a Problem in Society – But it’s a Problem That’s Being Addressed (16,362)

Visitors

  • Home
  • Business
  • Entertainment
  • Foodie
  • Headline
  • Health
  • Editorials
  • Lifestyle
  • Sports
  • UFO · Exopolitics
  • City
  • Sexuality
  • Dating